Ainius Sabaliauskas vs Bharath Nishok Kumaran Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W L L W W W L
Form
W W W L W W L L W LH2H: Sabaliauskas 1 - 0 Kumaran
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sabaliauskas winning 2 and Kumaran winning 0. The last match between Sabaliauskas and Kumaran was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-03-2025, Q2 round, Hard with Ainius Sabaliauskas getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ainius Sabaliauskas | 1 |
| Bharath Nishok Kumaran | 0 |
M15 Sharm ElSheikh(03-03-2025)
| Sabaliauskas | Stats | Kumaran |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (5-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | N/A |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 21 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 46% (46-55) | Career Total W/L | 47% (82-94) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabaliauskas VS Kumaran H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Sabaliauskas VS Kumaran H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ainius Sabaliauskas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ainius Sabaliauskas
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ainius Sabaliauskas
Player
Patrik Homola
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Daniele Rapagnetta
Player
Ainius Sabaliauskas
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(4) 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Bharath Nishok Kumaran Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rohan Mehra
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Grigoriy Lomakin
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
44%
(
32 of
72)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Ajay Malik
38%
(
21 of
56)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidharth Rawat
Player
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
69)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Chirag Duhan
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bharath Nishok Kumaran
Player
Varun Dhandhukia
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (46/55) | Win/Loss | 47% (82/94) |
| 47% (107/119) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (183/208) |
| 50% (1128/1150) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1782/1882) |
| 44% (23/29) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (65/70) |
| 49% (19/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 41% (17/24) |
| 40% (4/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 85 | Aces Total | 247 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 59 | Total Double Faults | 328 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 248.21 | Average Opponent Rank | 239.31 |
| 64% (953/1488) | 1st Serve % | 53% (3139/5902) |
| 70% (665/953) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2106/3139) |
| 48% (258/535) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1302/2763) |
| 40% (38/96) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (269/603) |
| 34% (504/1467) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2332/5817) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 46% (45/53) | Futures W/L | 47% (82/91) |
| 45% (45/100) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (81/174) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (16/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (15/30) |
| 36% (9/25) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (20/39) |
| 80% (50/40) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (82/69) |
| 20% (50/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (82/13) |
| 12% (51/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (94/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
